Maggie Selzer & Garrett Bullock: What is Motor Control?
Motor control is a phrase that surfaces often in the realm of physical therapy. Sometimes as part of a discussion related to theories of motor control and/or motor learning, sometimes in the context of biomechanics and sometimes in the contest of examination and treatment, amongst other topics.
Motor control is a phrase that guides principles of both examination and treatment and has succeeded in sparking much debate among students, faculty and clinicians.
It seems that if there were to be any productive debates surrounding the topic of motor control, then the term itself should be well defined. Thus a poll several of several prominent physical therapy Faculty members, from across the country was conducted, asking them one question:
What IS motor control?
The following word clouds represent the most commonly used words to answer this question from 11 faculty members. One of the images includes the words ‘motor,’ and ‘control,’ while the other doesn’t. If you are interested in seeing the full answers you can check those out at the end of this article.
While there was a significant amount of overlap in the words used to describe the term motor control, every answer had some variety to it.
Why is this question so hard to answer?
Why isn’t there a more unified definition for this term?
Why do all the answers to this question have so much overlap and similarity, but then when we move from definition to discussion about motor control we encounter much disagreement and debate?
Consider this definition of motor control from neuroscientist Vernon B. Brooks: Motor control is a field of study covering sensory, perceptive, and motor functions.
It is interesting that not a single physical therapy faculty member defined/described the term motor control as a “field of study.”
Perhaps part of the difficulty in asking the question, “what is motor control?” lies in the fact that this term covers an enormous breadth of potential topics such as: motor learning, theories of motor control, movement synergy, therapeutic exercise . . . etc.
Put more simply: It’s a garbage can term. Perhaps likened to other terms we have come across such as core stability, tone, lumbago and patellofemoral pain. Each of these terms/phrases has meaning and provides us with some amount of information, but none of them are specific or descriptive.
This excerpt from an editorial by Mark Latash, Professor of Kinesiology at Pennsylvania State University describes the current ambiguity dealing with motor control,
The field of motor control is relatively young, and there is still no universal agreement on the main goal of research in this field. I would define motor control as a field of research trying to discover laws of nature that describe interactions within the nervous system, and between the nervous system and the rest of the body and environment, leading to purposeful movements by biological systems.
If motor control is a field of study, and the people at the front of the field don’t even know what the goal of research in their field is . . . no wonder we can’t come to a consensus on this question!
So how does the profession of physical therapy fit in to the field of motor control?
How do we move forward to be able to discuss these concepts in a way that is productive?
Use descriptive language. Motor control is an entire field of study. We must be tireless in our effort to clearly express what it is we are actually trying to say.
It’s not enough to say that someone has a motor control problem. What do you ACTUALLY mean?
Is it a problem in the cortex?
Is it a motor learning problem?
Muscular recruitment pattern problem?
Force generation problem?
In my research on this subject, it became clear that the lack of a universal language to discuss the concepts of motor control have been a major barrier in the progress of this field of study. Furthermore, lack of a universal language has been a barrier in our own field of physical therapy when it comes to describing movement and why a person’s control of their movement is impaired. While it may not be your responsibility to create a unifying language to describe the field of study known as motor control, as a student, a faculty member and as a profession, we all need to challenge ourselves to use more specific and descriptive language in our conversations surrounding the topics of motor control.
I am again reminded of the APTA’s vision statement: “Transforming society by optimizing movement to improve the human experience.”
Assessing and describing movement are central to the mission of our profession. And the concepts of motor control so centrally fit in to the discussion related to how we optimize movement.
I think it’s safe to say that no matter what type of training/education you are receiving or have received and no matter what niche of physical therapy you have ended up in or are headed towards, movement will inevitably be a part of your practice. But how big of a part of your practice will movement be?
At what point in a patient’s/client’s experience does movement become relevant?
In a nice and tidy world, we would have two cut and dry scenarios:
- People with pathology have bad movement and pain
- People without pathology have good movement and no pain
In the real world, we know that it’s much more common to see the entire gamut of possibilities. For example, the person who we might expect to have pain from a herniated disc on imaging but who moves very well and does not have pain; or the person who through clinical observation and imaging cannot be determined to have pathology but moves badly and is in a lot of pain.
Having these variables that exist along a continuum and all interplay with one another makes our job as physical therapists challenging. What are we to do?
Ultimately, we are trying to “transform society by optimizing movement to improve the human experience.” What is the right treatment approach?
- Focus on patho-anatomical impairments?
- Focus on movement dysfunction?
- Focus on pain?
If you find yourself struggling to answer this question, you are not alone. In fact, the concept of movement is one that has recently gained a renewed sense of importance in our profession.
The vision statement above was adopted by the APTA in 2013. Part of what drove the revision of this statement was the recognition that as a profession, “we are still missing a common framework to describe the human movement system.”
The APTA reorganized its vision statement around the concepts of movement proposing to place the concept of the human movement system at the core of who we are and what we do.
Never heard of the ‘human movement system?’ The APTA defines the concept as follows:
Definition of the “Human Movement System”
The human movement system comprises the anatomic structures and physiologic functions that interact to move the body or its component parts.
Physical Therapist practice and the Human Movement System
Human movement is a complex behavior within a specific context
Physical therapist provide a unique perspective on purposeful, precise, and efficient movement across the lifespan based upon the synthesis of their distinctive knowledge of the movement system and expertise in mobility and locomotion.
Physical therapists examine and evaluate the movement system (including diagnosis and prognosis) to promote a customized and integrated plan of care to achieve the individual’s goal directed outcomes.
Physical therapists maximize an individual’s ability to engage with and respond to his or her environment using movement-related interventions to optimize functional capacity and performance.
I find the concept of the ‘human movement system’ to be particularly elegant. This system doesn’t ask us to choose a movement approach over a patho-anatomical approach or vice versa, but rather to integrate those models in to a more systematic approach. Your professional organization asks the following four basic requirements of you as a practitioner:
Basic requirements of a human movement system practitioner are:
- In depth, integrative knowledge of the human movement system and its component elements (anatomical structures and physiological functions)
- The ability to evaluate and diagnose movement dysfunction in the clinical setting (using observation, instruments, or both)
- The ability to identify physical impairments across various body systems (eg, integumentary, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, neurological, endocrine, genitourinary) that may be contributing to dysfunctional movement, such as muscle weakness, limited joint range of motion, limited oxygen exchange, or impaired motor control
- The ability to design an intervention program to address underlying impairments as well as the movement dysfunction itself
The concepts surrounding a human movement system are broad, having implications for practice, education, research, etc. I would hazard to guess that these concepts might elicit some amount of discomfort among practicing clinicians and students alike.
As our profession grows in to its new identity, however, some amount of discomfort seems expected. I hope that initial discomfort evolves in to a sense of excitement as you consider what it means to you to be a human movement system practitioner. For more information about the Human Movement System and what it means for our profession, I would encourage you to read this.
For a more detailed account of how the concepts surrounding the Human Movement System have evolved within our profession, I encourage you to read this perspective piece by Shirley A. Sahrmann.
“The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed without changing our thinking.”
― Albert Einstein
Faculty definitions of motor control:
The ability of the neuromuscular system to organize itself to produce purposeful movement as opposed to autonomic function.
Performing an activity repetitiously with unconscious control in a similar pattern of movement to the point of changing cortical activity in the brain.
The patient’s ability both consciously and subconsciously to successfully initiate, sustain, and complete a movement related task.
Synergy of the brain and musculoskeletal system to coordinate movement.
Ability to voluntarily control some aspect of the musculoskeletal system whether that be in part or whole (unit or single muscle). Ability to facilitate control, and produce the desired movement/result. OR the ability to control one’s motor.
Feature of movement that involves the ability to recruit muscles with timing, sequencing, and force generation that matches a functional task.
The processes that the nervous system uses to generate, regulate, and learn motor behaviors.
Your brain’s way of refining and controlling your movement. It’s a process that your brain interprets sensory information in a spec environment to determine your output for movement. It’s refined by experience, perception, emotion and motivation.
A function of the neurological system that involves the musculoskeletal system that enables us to move in a coordinated manner and includes timing, sequencing, and quality of movement.
Interplay of the neuromuscular and the musculoskeletal system to direct movements gain feedback from those movements and the external system and ideally to achieve a functional efficient pattern of movement.
Motor control is the means by which the body is moved and manipulated through the available range of motion. Full motor control cannot be demonstrated in the absence of full mobility. Dysfunctional motor control may have strength, posture, coordination, endurance, power, or insufficient regional mobility as its root cause. Dysfunctional motor control is identified when full or increased range of motion is made available as a result of changes in posture, position, level of assistance or joint isolation.
Maggie Selzer MS, PT, DPT
Maggie graduated from Duke University and currently works in the outpatient orthopedic setting. She is owner and head physical therapist of Excelsior Physical Therapy in Yuma, Arizona. She has a special interest in working with military and first responders. Currently, she is working to receive her fellowship training in orthopedic manual physical therapy.
Garrett Bullock PT, DPT
Garrett Bullock is a physical therapist and is currently reading for a Doctor of Philosophy in Musculoskeletal Sciences at the University of Oxford, UK. Prior to becoming a physical therapist, Garrett was a 4-year letter baseball winner at Wake Forest University and former professional baseball player in the Houston Astros Organization. Garrett has authored numerous scientific publications and has presented at the national and international level. His clinical and research focus is on athletic development, overhead athlete injuries, and the role of physical activity and sport on musculoskeletal health.
Tap into the Brains of Some of the World’s Leading Performance Experts
FREE Access to the OTP Vault
Inside the OTP Vault, you’ll find over 20 articles and videos from leading strength coaches, trainers and physical therapists such as Dan John, Gray Cook, Michael Boyle, Stuart McGill and Sue Falsone.
Click here to get FREE access to the On Target Publications vault and receive the latest relevant content to help you and your clients move and perform better.
NEVER MISS ANOTHER
Subscribe below and we'll send great articles to your email box. Includes FREE access to our OTP Vault of material from experts in the field.